QUOTE OF THE NOW

"Our life evokes our character. You find out more about yourself as you go on. That's why it's good to be able to put yourself in situations that will evoke your higher nature rather than your lower. 'Lead us not into temptation.'" Joseph Campbell

Wednesday, August 8, 2012

Has the internet become less bastardly?

For awhile I've been wanting to go through my old posts and see what's of value in there. I figure, while I'm at it, I might as well re-post a few.

I was happy to discover that the site bastardly.com, which I talked about in my first post on July 31, 2007, is no longer bastardly. It seems to have changed from a site that makes fun of celebrities to just another star-gazer site. I had originally linked to pictures they had posted of Sandra Oh, and some nasty comments:

...what with the plethora and popularity of "Gawd you guys are like SO ugly ha ha HA!" sites right now, I figured it wouldn't hurt to have an anti-fugly blog. I have a sense of humour, and I like seeing weird clothes too, but a lot of this stuff is so brutal it makes me a bit sick to my stomach.
Example: bastardly (don't ask me how I even come across these sites!) goes after Sandra Oh so much, it smacks of desperation. (Which of course also feels creepily racist.)

The link isn't dead, but it's just a bunch of photos from an award show; there's one of Oh and no nasty comments. ...Can it be? Are there some corners of the internet that have become less nasty in the last 5 years? Hey, we saw Perez turn over a new leaf, so who knows.
    

Tuesday, August 7, 2012

Pineapples, turnips, and monkey brains

This week I said to my dad and stepmama: We need a code word to describe when one of us is feeling depressed or grumpy or in some indescribable way not themselves. (My dad's mother passed away recently, and my stepmother is having pain problems in her arms, and you know I'm all in homesicky.) Cause if you ask someone "Are you feeling depressed?" or "Are you feeling grumpy?" it usually makes things worse and they deny it anyway.

My stepmother said I should be called pineapple on those days, cause I don't like pineapple. I thought that was perfect. (And my fave show Psych always features a pineapple!)

I said we'd call her bad days turnip, cause she hates turnips. But we couldn't think of a word for my dad, cause he likes most foods. He said: "Well I might not like monkey brains, like that Indiana Jones movie." So we call his bad days monkeybrains.

This has become an excellent code word, requiring no further explanation. For example...

Last night I couldn't get to sleep til 9 AM cause I was upset about something. When my stepmother got up she looked into my room:

SM - Why are you up so early?
Moi - I couldn't go to sleep. Pineapple.
SM - Ah. (She nodded understandingly.) I couldn't fall asleep cause I was in so much pain, so I'm...
Moi - Turnip.
SM - I'm turnip today. How about your dad, is he monkeybrains?
Moi - I don't know.

Feel free to adopt your own Hate This Food Off Day Label.
 

Monday, August 6, 2012

Geeks: Just as uncool as anyone else

Awhile back Alastair Stephens of Storywonk had a blog post about the new popularity of geekdom. He was warning against geekatude crossing the line into considering themselves the cool ones, and looking down on the non-geeks:


 Geeks aren’t just accepted for who they are, but they are the new pinnacle of the social pyramid; they are the new cool. But that isn’t what being a nerd is about; more importantly, it never was. ... Cool is exclusionary ... Nerds, geeks — and yes, wonks — are passionate about things. They aren’t embarrassed to care or obsess; they never sacrifice their enthusiasm to look cool, and they don’t expect anyone else to do so either. Being a geek should be an inherently inclusive way to live; it isn’t about delineating us and them (Keep Your Cool)


This didn't sit right with me. First, I disagree that geeks have never wanted to be cool. Most geeks aren't outsiders because they're passionate about things, and don't care who knows it; it's because they don't read social cues very well. You see that reflected in a show like Freaks and Geeks. There are three main "geeks" one of whom would like to be cool, but just don't know how. Only one of them is so secure about himself that when confronted with what it takes to be more accepted, refuses to give in (Bill! It's why we love Bill!)

I know the difference 'cause when I was in high school I was the person who could read the social cues and consciously reject them. I actually wasn't teased by the In Crowd; it was by the heavy-metal-smoking-up gang, some French kids, the middle of the road kids (who wanted to be more In), and sometimes by nerds. The nerds could only see that I dressed different than Everyone Else, and judged me for that like anyone else.

Which brings me to point #2: Nerds have their own ideas of what's cool and not cool, within their own circle. And nothing shows this more than the unbearably nasty world of role playing games. And that world is just as macho, sexist, exclusionary, and shitty as any Engineering department or cop precinct of old. (Okay not so old.) This became disgustingly clear during a series of incidents my brother pointed out to me, of culture blogger Anita Sarkeesian who decided to raise money to do a series on the portrayal of women in video games. She instantly began receiving hate comments, personal threats, hacking attacks, sexual harassment, and more. (The New York Times has a larger story on sexual harassment in gaming.)

If there are geeks who are excited by a new found cool status, it's because there have always been geeks who wanted to be cool, they just didn't know how. I don't think there's anything inherently inclusionary about geek culture. Maybe there is in "wonk" culture, if there's such a thing. But generally I would say judgmental-tude is a cross cutting feature of society.
 

Reading

Hold Me Tight: Seven Conversations for a Lifetime of Love
Les années douces : Volume 1
Back on the Rez
My Stroke of Insight: A Brain Scientist's Personal Journey
Stupeur et tremblements
}